What's considered a download?

In our v13 community, we've noticed that a particular video in a group media gallery has been doing very well - it's been downloaded 300 times. "Great!" I thought to myself as I headed to the video to see what was so interesting about it. However, when viewing the figures, as per 'How do I see download counts of files in a media gallery, I noticed my name in the stats.  I definitely did not download the video, I merely viewed the page, I didn't even play the video! Open mouth

So, my questions:

  • Has anyone else noticed this?
  • Is it intended behaviour?
  • Is it a known bug (that I didn't know about)?

Looking forward to any replies Slight smile

Thanks

Liz

Parents
  • Hi  

    Thanks for flagging this — I've been able to replicate the exact behavior you're describing (same result: the count/stats show a "download" for me even though I never clicked to download or played the video, just viewed the page).

    I checked the public documentation and it confirms download counts exist and can be viewed/exported (Manage > Manage Gallery > Files, then select a file and click Downloads for the who/when report), but it doesn't spell out the counting methodology — there's no public statement on whether a "download" is logged per click, deduplicated per user, or whether simply opening/loading a video's page counts as a "download" versus a separate "view." For what it's worth, the Media REST API does confirm the platform tracks Views and Downloads as two distinct counters on a media item, so it's designed to treat "viewed" and "downloaded" separately — but the trigger logic for each isn't documented.

    My best guess is that this may be tied to how the gallery handles video playback vs. embedded/third-party video (e.g., if this video is rendered via YouTube or another embed rather than a native upload) — it's possible what's being logged as a "download" is actually closer to a page view/impression, since simply landing on the page seems to trigger it.

    I don't want to guess too confidently since I can't see the underlying tracking logic, so I'd recommend opening a support ticket with Verint so they can confirm whether this is expected behavior for that video type or a bug in the download-count logic. Hopefully someone from Verint support can jump in here too and clarify.

    Will keep an eye on this thread — curious to hear if others have seen the same thing.

Reply
  • Hi  

    Thanks for flagging this — I've been able to replicate the exact behavior you're describing (same result: the count/stats show a "download" for me even though I never clicked to download or played the video, just viewed the page).

    I checked the public documentation and it confirms download counts exist and can be viewed/exported (Manage > Manage Gallery > Files, then select a file and click Downloads for the who/when report), but it doesn't spell out the counting methodology — there's no public statement on whether a "download" is logged per click, deduplicated per user, or whether simply opening/loading a video's page counts as a "download" versus a separate "view." For what it's worth, the Media REST API does confirm the platform tracks Views and Downloads as two distinct counters on a media item, so it's designed to treat "viewed" and "downloaded" separately — but the trigger logic for each isn't documented.

    My best guess is that this may be tied to how the gallery handles video playback vs. embedded/third-party video (e.g., if this video is rendered via YouTube or another embed rather than a native upload) — it's possible what's being logged as a "download" is actually closer to a page view/impression, since simply landing on the page seems to trigger it.

    I don't want to guess too confidently since I can't see the underlying tracking logic, so I'd recommend opening a support ticket with Verint so they can confirm whether this is expected behavior for that video type or a bug in the download-count logic. Hopefully someone from Verint support can jump in here too and clarify.

    Will keep an eye on this thread — curious to hear if others have seen the same thing.

Children