https://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-ui/1624104Fri, 13 Nov 2026 11:55:00 GMTforumreply:1624104Karl Barber is out today, but this doesn't answer the question. You can clearly see from Karl's original screenshot, that the assembly version is set and shows in File Explorer as 33.1.0.26 but in Community it is shown as 33.0.0.0. We know how to set the assembly version, but Community is only showing the major version, so we cannot see which assembly versions are deployed.https://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-ui/1624103Fri, 13 Nov 2026 07:01:00 GMTforumreply:1624103The custom assemblies panel currently displays the .net assembly version, which is often fixed and doesn't change between builds. [quote userid="278531" url="~/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-ui"]Is it possible to alter the information shown ? [/quote] re: your question Yes, for your own custom plugins, you can set the assembly version per build in the csproj file (e.g. 14.0.12.0 ) , and after you rebuild and redeploy, the panel will show the exact build. Please test this first, as changing the assembly version can break binding if other assemblies reference that plugin. For 3rd party libraries, the assembly version is fixed by the vendor, so it can't be changed on your side.https://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-ui/1624102Thu, 12 Nov 2026 09:15:00 GMTforumreply:1624102Local instance of 14 build 684, as you can see from the screen grabs the version in the community is only show the major value for some dlls and also not showing any date values as per previous versionshttps://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-ui/1624100Thu, 12 Nov 2026 07:15:00 GMTforumreply:1624100Version information listed under the custom assemblies panel should match the version displayed under the file’s Properties > Details. Could you please let us know which site this is?https://community.telligent.com/community-engineer-jakarta/Wed, 11 Nov 2026 04:02:00 GMTgroup:2288https://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152662/how-are-custom-assembly-versions-determined-for-the-admin-uiTue, 10 Nov 2026 17:49:00 GMTforum:1152662Looking in the new custom assemblies panel the version number does not fully reflect the details from the underlying dll so it is not possible to confirm which exact version has been deployed, esp on a saas environment for example CsvHelper shows as 33.0.0.0 but has more specific details in the dll This is also the case if we look at some of our own custom dlls such as the ticketing app which simply shows as 14.0.0.0 rather than the specific build Is it possible to alter the information shown ?https://community.telligent.com/community/13/f/ask-the-community/1152616/what-s-considered-a-download/1624081Wed, 04 Nov 2026 16:50:00 GMTforumreply:1624081Just updating this in case anyone is following - there is no ETA on the fix for this issuehttps://community.telligent.com/w/support/75836/community-lifecycle-milestonesFri, 30 Oct 2026 17:04:00 GMTwiki:75836The lifecycle policy is defined around the following milestones. General Availability (GA) Generally Available; means the date on which a Product or Version of a Product is available for sale or license to Verint's general customers. End of Sale (EoS) "EoS" or "End of Sale" means a Version of a Product is no longer sold (excluding any expansion sales of existing installations, which shall not serve to extend the EoS period). End of Sale occurs when either (i) Verint releases the next Version of that Product, or (ii) Verint issues notice, either in writing or on its related website, that it no longer intends to sell that Product. End of Mainstream Support (EoMS) “EoMS” or “End of Mainstream Support” means, unless otherwise extended by Verint via notice in writing, including on Verint’s related Support website, the period ending three (3) years after EoS. End of Maintenance (EoM) “EoM” or “End of Maintenance” means the date announced by Verint as the last day in which any Support will be provided by Verint for that Version of the Product, or if applicable, that Product; provided such date is after the date applicable to EoMS. In the event Verint does not announce a specific date for EoM, EoM shall occur twelve (12) months from EoMS. ​ ​Software Updates ​End of Sale to End of Mainstream Support ​End of Mainstream Support to End of Maintenance ​Post End of Maintenance ​Existing Error Corrections/Workarounds ​Included ​Included ​N/A ​New Error Corrections/Workarounds ​Included ​N/A ​N/A ​Product Support Access ​Included ​Included ​N/A ​New Versions* ​Included ​Included ​N/A Product Versions GA EoS EoMS EoM Community 14.0 On-Prem Apr 30, 2027 TBD TBD TBD 14.0 SaaS Oct 06, 2026 TBD TBD TBD 13.0 On-Prem Apr 22, 2024 Oct 06 , 2026 Oct 06, 2028 Oct 06,2028 13.0 SaaS (Note 1) Apr 22, 2024 Oct 06, 2026 Apr 30, 2027 Apr 30, 2027 12.1 May 17, 2022 Apr 22, 2024 Oct 22, 2025 Oct 22, 2026 12 Feb 28, 2021 May 17, 2022 Jan 31, 2024 Jan 31, 2025 11.1 Nov 30, 2019 Feb 28, 2021 Nov 30, 2022 May 31, 2023 11 Jun 30, 2019 Nov 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2022 Dec 31, 2022 10.3 Dec 31, 2018 Jun 30, 2019 Jan 31, 2021 Jun 30, 2021 10.2 Aug 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2018 Aug 31, 2020 Feb 28, 2021 10.1 Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2018 Feb 28, 2020 Aug 31, 2020 10 Feb 28, 2017​ Aug 31, 2017 Feb 31, 2020 Aug 31, 2020 9.x Dec 31, 2015 Feb 28,2017​ Dec 31, 2018 Jun 30, 2019 8.5 Nov 30, 2014 Dec 31, 2015 May 31, 2017 Nov 30, 2017 8.0 Mar 31, 2014 Nov 30, 2014 Sep 31, 2016 Mar 30, 2017 Notes Note 1: All SaaS Customers are required to upgrade and migrate to 14.x by April 30, 2027.Lifecyclehttps://community.telligent.com/employees/pd/test-group/w/wikis-1493795104Fri, 30 Oct 2026 03:46:00 GMTwikiapp:1417https://community.telligent.com/employees/pd/test-group/w/wikis-1493795104Fri, 30 Oct 2026 03:46:00 GMTwiki:79992https://community.telligent.com/employees/pd/test-group/w/wikisFri, 30 Oct 2026 03:45:00 GMTwikiapp:1416https://community.telligent.com/employees/pd/test-group/w/wikisFri, 30 Oct 2026 03:45:00 GMTwiki:79991https://community.telligent.com/community/13/f/ask-the-community/1152651/url-link-findTue, 27 Oct 2026 18:40:00 GMTforum:1152651Hi, We are migrating from legacy on prem SharePoint to the new 365 cloud SharePoint, requiring all SharePoint owners to move their content and files to the new environment which in turn creates all new URLs, and breaking links in the community. We are able to run a script to find the content where all the URLs reside for a mass URL update for each group, but we also want group owners to review the content and links to see if they are still relevant and needed. We were able to include the content ID in the results of the script which helps filter out erroneous and duplicate results, but it doesn't look like a user can use the content ID to search for it in the community. Is there a script that can be run to locate the SharePoint URLs and provide the community URL for group owners to be able to go in and verify content without having to data mine their entire group?LinksURLscripthttps://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1152063/adding-jump-links-to-an-article/1624059Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:59:00 GMTforumreply:1624059Thanks for checking, Sara Collins . That difference is really strange. I'm on 12.1.4.25057 (upgraded from 11.1.###) and don't have any customizations to the editor to my knowledge. Another option is to go into the post's HTML and manually add a with an id={your_id} which replicates this functionality, just takes some extra steps. ( {your section of text} and then going to https://cancerchat.cancerresearchuk.org/a/forum-guide/c/forum-rules/FG44/terms-conditions#jump_link_1 should perform the same way)https://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1152063/adding-jump-links-to-an-article/1624058Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:23:00 GMTforumreply:1624058Hi Sarah Wilson and Alex Nassi ! I just wanted to share some testing I did on this one. Social Edge hosts a couple of demo sites that are pretty vanilla, with little to no customizations: one on version 13 and one on 12.1.4. On both sites I went through both of Alex’s checks. I made sure URL embedding (under Files and URL Embedding) was enabled in Filtering, both globally (Administration > Moderation > Filtering) and for Articles (Administration > Applications > Content > Articles > Filtering). I also checked other application types, like blogs and forums. I didn’t see the Anchor option in the Insert menu on either demo site, in any application. So I’m wondering if this comes down to version or customizations rather than a setting. Would you both mind sharing: Which version of Verint Community you’re on? Whether your site has any customizations to the editor or widgets? Alex, if you upgraded recently, it’s possible your site kept the Anchor option through the upgrade. Sarah, if your site has customizations, one of them may have overwritten it. Or, if Sarah’s site is on a later version than Alex’s, Verint may have removed the Anchor option from the editor in that release. In the meantime, the Table of Contents approach is still an option, with one thing to know: when you click an item in the TOC, the page scrolls slightly past the heading. That’s most likely because the site’s header bar sits on top of the content, so the heading ends up hidden underneath it. It can be fixed with a small customization to the TOC link behavior that offsets the jump by a set number of pixels, matching the header height, so the heading lands just below the bar. Happy to share more on that if it would help! Thank you both so much! I’m looking forward to figuring this one out together :)https://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1152063/adding-jump-links-to-an-article/1624057Tue, 20 Oct 2026 15:12:00 GMTforumreply:1624057Sarah Wilson – your "Insert" menu in Articles is much different than mine: My guess is to try going to Admin > Applications > Content > Articles and seeing what you've deactivated that may be relevant. Maybe "Mentions" or "URL Embedding"? I don't know what would control that. I'd also recommend testing another application type (blog, forum, etc.) to see if that option shows there so you can narrow the issue down to Articles or not.https://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1152063/adding-jump-links-to-an-article/1624054Tue, 20 Oct 2026 10:29:00 GMTforumreply:1624054sorry this is a really old thread but I am trying to do this and actually we don't have the anchor option in the editor? Is this something I can fix easily?https://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1151401/how-can-you-create-a-new-article-using-the-rest-api/1624048Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:11:00 GMTforumreply:1624048It is generated automaticallyhttps://community.telligent.com/community/12/f/ask-the-community/1151401/how-can-you-create-a-new-article-using-the-rest-api/1624047Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:41:00 GMTforumreply:1624047How is the ID created when making a new article via API?https://community.telligent.com/community/14/f/ask-the-community/1152642/clean-install-has-errors-re-search---content-search-schema-is-incorrect/1624045Wed, 14 Oct 2026 14:28:00 GMTforumreply:1624045Yes the compose file from How do I get started with installation? has the version (644) which appeared to work for Justin McCullagh after updating the search ver from 619 to 639 but not for me I also have a separate build from the dev example page which has 684 and 639 and that also shows the same error re search